Time to Leave UNESCO - Again
 |  |
- UNESCO's poisonous, fraudulent resolution is not only biased: it is negationist. All traces of Jewish presence in Jerusalem and Judea in ancient times are eliminated at the stroke of a pen.
- Only six countries voted to reject the resolution: the United States, Estonia, Germany, Lithuania, the Netherlands and the United Kingdom. France, Spain, Sweden, Slovenia accepted the text and voted yes. The resolution was presented with the support of several Muslim countries -- some often described as "moderate": Egypt, Tunisia and Morocco.
- UNESCO is a branch of the United Nations, and the UN is an organization where democracies are in the minority, surrounded by a huge majority of dictatorships and authoritarian regimes imbued with hatred toward the West. Israel is virtually the only country designated as guilty of violating human rights by the so-called Human Rights Council, and where, in 2009, Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad was welcomed as a hero.
On April 11, 2016, the Executive Board of UNESCO adopted a resolution called "Occupied Palestine." The title immediately exposes it as a biased document. That is not surprising. All the texts adopted by UNESCO concerning the Middle East are biased.
However, those who read it carefully can see that a further step was taken.
UNESCO's resolution is not only biased: it is negationist. All traces of Jewish presence in Jerusalem and Judea in ancient times are eliminated at the stroke of a pen. The Temple Mount is never mentioned. It is only called by the name al-Aqsa Mosque / Haram al Sharif. The name "Western Wall" is placed between quotation marks, to indicate that it is an invalid name: Al Buraq Wall is used without quotation marks. The graves of Jewish cemeteries are described as "Jewish fake graves."
It is a radical anti-Semitic resolution: denying historical fact, claiming that what exists does not, presenting the history of Judaism and the Jews as lies. Accusing Jews of "planting Jewish fake graves" is the lie. It is saying that Judaism is a sham and Jews are liars and falsifiers.
The document is absolutely anti-historical, anti-fact and "anti-Zionist": it tries unambiguously to "prove" that Israel was founded on an imposture and has no reason to exist. The document constantly describes Israel as the "occupying power" and presents it as a predatory and arbitrary country.
Voting for such a text means would endorsing historical negationism, radical anti-Semitism, and absolute "anti-Zionism".
Correctly deciphering the meaning of the resolution and its implications, the representatives of six Western countries -- the United States, Estonia, Germany, Lithuania, the Netherlands and the United Kingdom -- voted no.
Representatives of other Western countries -- France, Spain, Sweden, Slovenia -- accepted the text and voted yes.
The resolution was presented with the support of several Muslim countries -- some often described as "moderate": Egypt, Tunisia and Morocco.
The text was written by Palestinian Authority (PA) "experts." Since 2011, the Palestinian Authority has had a seat at UNESCO under the name "State of Palestine."
The Israeli government immediately expressed its anger. Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said that "anyone, let alone an organization tasked with preserving history, could deny this link which spans thousands of years."
A petition was circulated by Stand With Us and the International Legal Forum, demanding that UNESCO change its attitude and remains "true to its founding principles."
The anger of Israel's government and indignation of others other is legitimate. The petition is fully justified.
However, expecting that UNESCO will change its attitude is illusory. Expecting that UNESCO will remain true to its founding principles is hoping for something that will not happen. UNESCO long ago abandoned its founding principles.
UNESCO is a branch of the United Nations, and the UN is an organization where democracies are in the minority, surrounded by a huge majority of dictatorships and authoritarian regimes imbued with hatred toward the West.[1] Israel is virtually the only country designated as guilty of violating human rights by the so-called Human Rights Council, and where, in 2009, Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad was welcomed as a hero.
In October, 2015, UNESCO had already started down path it follows today. It defined Rachel's Tomb as the Bilal bin Rabah Mosque and the Cave of the Patriarchs as the Ibrahimi Mosque, and declared them "Palestinian sites."
What is worrisome is that only six Western countries were ready to reject a totally poisonous, fraudulent resolution.
The Western countries that voted for the resolution evidently approve of its contents. These countries have lost all legitimacy to claim they want peace in the Middle East. By approving the resolution, they show they are at war: against Judaism, Jews and Israel. One of them, France, claims it will hold a meeting to revive the "peace process": in this context, the claim is grotesque.
The fact that a group of Muslim countries, often described as "moderate," supported the resolution can only lead to the question: How can a country that supports such a document be described as "moderate?"
That Palestinian Authority "experts" have written such a resolution should be sufficient to show that the PA is not "moderate." It clearly has no intention at all of creating a State alongside Israel; instead, as its leaders often openly admit, its plan is that Israel has to be demonized, crushed and replaced.
The underlying problem is that this negationism, anti-Semitism and "anti-Zionism" are deeply rooted in both Europe and Islam.
The Quran says Jews and Christians ("Crusaders") have falsified their sacred books, and the history of Judaism and the Jewish people is false. Muslim tradition says that Muhammadascended to heaven from al Aqsa, and that the Al Buraq Wall is the wall where he attached thewinged creature on which he flew to heaven. No room is left for the Temple Mount or the Western Wall, even though they were there, with countless archeological artifacts, for more than a thousand years before Muhammad was even born.
Muslim tradition also says that Jews, as disbelievers, are condemned to the humiliating status ofdhimmi,[2] and that all territories conquered by Islam have to remain Muslim forever.[3] Muslim tradition cannot accept a country ruled by Jews or Christians on land that was once conquered by Islam -- whether Israel, formerly part of the Ottoman Empire, or large swaths of Portugal and Spain.
The resolution adopted by the Executive Board of UNESCO on April 11 is "Islamically correct." "Moderate" Muslim countries cannot contradict the Quran and Muslim tradition without risking being accused of irtidad (apostasy).[4] Palestinian Authority "experts" are being true to the Quran and to Muslim tradition.
Western countries that approved the resolution showed their submission and dhimmitude to "Islamic correctness." Dhimmis, in Islamic history, are second class, "tolerated" citizens, who are subjected to special laws which remind them of their inferiority as well as a tax, the jizya, to purchase "protection" for their homes, possessions and lives.[5]
Countries that rejected the resolution would be considered insubordinate.
Refusing such a resolution is not enough. It is about time to ask the Muslim world to leave behind its heavy load of noxious traditions, blackmail threats and violence.
It is also time to do more.
Under the presidency of Ronald Reagan, the United States left UNESCO in 1984, because UNESCO was obviously subservient to the Soviet Union, and was serving interests contrary to those of freedom, liberty and Western values.
The United States returned to UNESCO in 2003. In 2011, when the Palestinian Authority was admitted to UNESCO, the U.S. froze its financial contribution.
The United States badly needs to leave UNESCO again. UNESCO is obviously subservient to "Islamic correctness," and serving interests contrary to those of freedom, liberty and Western values. Eighty years ago, negationism and anti-Semitism led to the Holocaust. It is urgent to say, "Enough."
[1] Dore Gold, Tower of Babble: How the United Nations Has Fueled Global Chaos, Crown Forum, 2005.
[2] Bat Ye'or, Islam and Dhimmitude: Where Civilizations Collide, Fairleigh Dickinson University Press, 2001.
[3] Robert Spencer, Islam Unveiled: Disturbing Questions about the World's Fastest-Growing Faith, Encounter Books, 2003.
[4] Yohanan Friedmann, Tolerance and Coercion in Islam: Interfaith Relations in the Muslim Tradition, Cambridge University Press, 2006.
[5] Bat Ye'or, op. cit.
However, those who read it carefully can see that a further step was taken.
UNESCO's resolution is not only biased: it is negationist. All traces of Jewish presence in Jerusalem and Judea in ancient times are eliminated at the stroke of a pen. The Temple Mount is never mentioned. It is only called by the name al-Aqsa Mosque / Haram al Sharif. The name "Western Wall" is placed between quotation marks, to indicate that it is an invalid name: Al Buraq Wall is used without quotation marks. The graves of Jewish cemeteries are described as "Jewish fake graves."
It is a radical anti-Semitic resolution: denying historical fact, claiming that what exists does not, presenting the history of Judaism and the Jews as lies. Accusing Jews of "planting Jewish fake graves" is the lie. It is saying that Judaism is a sham and Jews are liars and falsifiers.
The document is absolutely anti-historical, anti-fact and "anti-Zionist": it tries unambiguously to "prove" that Israel was founded on an imposture and has no reason to exist. The document constantly describes Israel as the "occupying power" and presents it as a predatory and arbitrary country.
Voting for such a text means would endorsing historical negationism, radical anti-Semitism, and absolute "anti-Zionism".
Correctly deciphering the meaning of the resolution and its implications, the representatives of six Western countries -- the United States, Estonia, Germany, Lithuania, the Netherlands and the United Kingdom -- voted no.
Representatives of other Western countries -- France, Spain, Sweden, Slovenia -- accepted the text and voted yes.
The resolution was presented with the support of several Muslim countries -- some often described as "moderate": Egypt, Tunisia and Morocco.
The text was written by Palestinian Authority (PA) "experts." Since 2011, the Palestinian Authority has had a seat at UNESCO under the name "State of Palestine."
The Israeli government immediately expressed its anger. Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said that "anyone, let alone an organization tasked with preserving history, could deny this link which spans thousands of years."
A petition was circulated by Stand With Us and the International Legal Forum, demanding that UNESCO change its attitude and remains "true to its founding principles."
The anger of Israel's government and indignation of others other is legitimate. The petition is fully justified.
However, expecting that UNESCO will change its attitude is illusory. Expecting that UNESCO will remain true to its founding principles is hoping for something that will not happen. UNESCO long ago abandoned its founding principles.
UNESCO is a branch of the United Nations, and the UN is an organization where democracies are in the minority, surrounded by a huge majority of dictatorships and authoritarian regimes imbued with hatred toward the West.[1] Israel is virtually the only country designated as guilty of violating human rights by the so-called Human Rights Council, and where, in 2009, Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad was welcomed as a hero.
In October, 2015, UNESCO had already started down path it follows today. It defined Rachel's Tomb as the Bilal bin Rabah Mosque and the Cave of the Patriarchs as the Ibrahimi Mosque, and declared them "Palestinian sites."
What is worrisome is that only six Western countries were ready to reject a totally poisonous, fraudulent resolution.
The Western countries that voted for the resolution evidently approve of its contents. These countries have lost all legitimacy to claim they want peace in the Middle East. By approving the resolution, they show they are at war: against Judaism, Jews and Israel. One of them, France, claims it will hold a meeting to revive the "peace process": in this context, the claim is grotesque.
The fact that a group of Muslim countries, often described as "moderate," supported the resolution can only lead to the question: How can a country that supports such a document be described as "moderate?"
That Palestinian Authority "experts" have written such a resolution should be sufficient to show that the PA is not "moderate." It clearly has no intention at all of creating a State alongside Israel; instead, as its leaders often openly admit, its plan is that Israel has to be demonized, crushed and replaced.
The underlying problem is that this negationism, anti-Semitism and "anti-Zionism" are deeply rooted in both Europe and Islam.
The Quran says Jews and Christians ("Crusaders") have falsified their sacred books, and the history of Judaism and the Jewish people is false. Muslim tradition says that Muhammadascended to heaven from al Aqsa, and that the Al Buraq Wall is the wall where he attached thewinged creature on which he flew to heaven. No room is left for the Temple Mount or the Western Wall, even though they were there, with countless archeological artifacts, for more than a thousand years before Muhammad was even born.
Muslim tradition also says that Jews, as disbelievers, are condemned to the humiliating status ofdhimmi,[2] and that all territories conquered by Islam have to remain Muslim forever.[3] Muslim tradition cannot accept a country ruled by Jews or Christians on land that was once conquered by Islam -- whether Israel, formerly part of the Ottoman Empire, or large swaths of Portugal and Spain.
The resolution adopted by the Executive Board of UNESCO on April 11 is "Islamically correct." "Moderate" Muslim countries cannot contradict the Quran and Muslim tradition without risking being accused of irtidad (apostasy).[4] Palestinian Authority "experts" are being true to the Quran and to Muslim tradition.
Western countries that approved the resolution showed their submission and dhimmitude to "Islamic correctness." Dhimmis, in Islamic history, are second class, "tolerated" citizens, who are subjected to special laws which remind them of their inferiority as well as a tax, the jizya, to purchase "protection" for their homes, possessions and lives.[5]
Countries that rejected the resolution would be considered insubordinate.
Refusing such a resolution is not enough. It is about time to ask the Muslim world to leave behind its heavy load of noxious traditions, blackmail threats and violence.
It is also time to do more.
Under the presidency of Ronald Reagan, the United States left UNESCO in 1984, because UNESCO was obviously subservient to the Soviet Union, and was serving interests contrary to those of freedom, liberty and Western values.
 U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry spoke in French to a gathering of UNESCO representatives in Paris, on Oct 18, 2015, assuring them that "the engagement of the United States with this organization has never been as strong as now." |
The United States returned to UNESCO in 2003. In 2011, when the Palestinian Authority was admitted to UNESCO, the U.S. froze its financial contribution.
The United States badly needs to leave UNESCO again. UNESCO is obviously subservient to "Islamic correctness," and serving interests contrary to those of freedom, liberty and Western values. Eighty years ago, negationism and anti-Semitism led to the Holocaust. It is urgent to say, "Enough."
Dr. Guy Millière, a professor at the University of Paris, is the author of 27 books on France and Europe.
[1] Dore Gold, Tower of Babble: How the United Nations Has Fueled Global Chaos, Crown Forum, 2005.
[2] Bat Ye'or, Islam and Dhimmitude: Where Civilizations Collide, Fairleigh Dickinson University Press, 2001.
[3] Robert Spencer, Islam Unveiled: Disturbing Questions about the World's Fastest-Growing Faith, Encounter Books, 2003.
[4] Yohanan Friedmann, Tolerance and Coercion in Islam: Interfaith Relations in the Muslim Tradition, Cambridge University Press, 2006.
[5] Bat Ye'or, op. cit.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.