BILL'S TWITTER PAGE

Monday, October 22, 2012

Obama Doctrine: Ft. Hood Was Not Terrorism, Wounded Soldiers Get No Benefits

Obama Doctrine: Ft. Hood Was Not Terrorism, Wounded Soldiers Get No Benefits

OBAMA DOCTRINE: FT. HOOD WAS NOT TERRORISM, WOUNDED SOLDIERS GET NO BENEFITS

 234
 12
 1780
 

Print ArticleSend a Tip
 21 Oct 2012 167POST A COMMENT

Victims of the Nov. 2009 Ft. Hood shooting are being denied benefits commensurate with combat injuries because the Obama administration refuses to label the attack an act of terrorism.

Instead, the shooting Maj. Nidal Hasan carried out after screaming "Allahu Akbar" it is still being labeled "workplace violence." 
The difference between labeling the incident "workplace violence" and "terrorism" is not only the rightful recognition 13 of our troops deserve for being killed in service to their country on Nov. 5, 2009, but also ongoing benefits that would help survivors pay for the physical therapy, and other medical and psychological treatments that might be necessary to a full recovery.
Texas Gov. Rick Perry has openly stated that the shooting, which took place in his state, was an act of terrorism and that the president such recognize it as such. He said, "President Obama's refusal to call it an act of terror is a shining example of this administration's devotion to political correctness over the defense of our men and women in uniform."

ON BREITBART TV

Obama Admin Denies Benefits to Victims Of Hasan's 'Workplace Violence'

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.