Americans Hung Out to Dry in Benghazi | American Clarion

Americans Hung Out to Dry in Benghazi | American Clarion

Americans Hung Out to Dry in Benghazi

October 27, 2012   ·   By Bob Ellis   ·   1 Comments

digg

By now, hopefully you have heard about how the Obama Administration denied requests from our people under attack in Benghazi last month for assistance.  If you haven’t, this news report spells out how this incompetent administration hung our people out to dry.

So was it pure, garden-variety ineptitude from the Obama Administration that led to repeated denials for requests for help, or was it moral incompetence?

An article a friend sent to me earlier today claims it was more of the latter.  Allegedly, this had to do with plans by the Obama Administration to put arms into the hands of anti-Assad Syrians with the final goal being a new Muslim Brotherhood-backed government like we have seen in other areas of the “Arab Spring.”

From the Canada Free Press:

According to my source, Ambassador Stevens was in Benghazi on September 11, 2012 to meet with his Turkish counterpart, who reportedly warned Stevens that the operation was compromised. They met in person so that Stevens could be shown overhead satellite images, taken by the Russians, of nefarious activities taking place in Turkey. But just what were these nefarious activities?
It is reasonable to suspect that these activities were more dire than just your average “gun running” operation. Since the overthrow of Qaddafi, it is estimated that upwards of 40 million tons of weapons and arms were shipped out of Libya to Syria. But it was also known inside intelligence circles that Qaddafi possessed chemical weapons in addition to numerous surface-to-air missiles. Could it be that Russia obtained unmistakable surveillance footage of the anti-Assad “rebels” being shown how to load chemical payloads onto missiles inside Turkey near the border of Syria? Weapons, of course, that were shipped from Libya by the CIA in conjunction with various Muslim Brotherhood rebel groups. If so, such weapons could be used as a “false flag” type of operation—one that would be implemented to “set-up” Assad by making it appear that he was using these weapons on forces dedicated to his overthrow.
The blowback by the international community would be swift and punishing, and the entirety of the civilized world would be demanding his overthrow. NATO would then be used to expedite his ouster, and Russia’s moral position within the international community would be weakened. Was the meeting held to show Stevens that the operation was compromised and that they had to stop?

Was this a mess, a blown operation that we had to DK (claim we “Didn’t Know” about), and keep our hands off for fear of further exposure? Was it a matter of hoping to hide the blown operation under the BS-storm of propaganda about a lame anti-Islam film and hyped-up protests about that film?

Frankly I don’t know what is the bigger scandal here: (1) The Obama Administration’s complicity in arming jihadis, or (2) the “mainstream” media’s desperate complicit coverup of the arming of jihadis by their messiah.

---