Wednesday, October 29, 2014

Tuesday, October 28, 2014

UK: 75-year-old man charged with “racially aggravated harassment” for saying “I’m not Muslim” at airport security check : Jihad Watch

Monday, October 27, 2014

Salvation And Survival: "What If You Gave A War & Nobody Tweeted?"

Saturday, October 25, 2014

Lapid: Israel-US relations in 'crisis' - Israel News, Ynetnews

Friday, October 24, 2014

10 Things You Need To Know About ISIS

Thursday, October 23, 2014

How To Spot The Emergent Church Entering Yours - Jan Markell / Eric Barger

THE TRUTH OF SCRIPTURE AND THE EMERGENT CHURCH MOVEMENT Guest: Jim Fletcher

Obama Asserts Fast and Furious Executive Privilege Claim for Holder’s Wife - Judicial Watch

The NWO [Agenda 21] (Population Control) Ebola

MO. Dr.: Ebola Like Cases Being Covered Up Patients Bleeding From Every ...

Sid Roth Interview with Glenda Jackson on "Its Supernatural"

"Domestic Terrorist" Roundup Coming Soon & Who They Will Target! Urgent ...

Wednesday, October 22, 2014

Watch: This Guy Just Asked The One Question About Obama That Could Destroy The Democrats

"It's quite remarkable. But what's also remarkable to me is the reaction..."

JUSTIN KOSKI — OCTOBER 21, 2014

Jason Riley, a Wall Street Journal columnist, criticized Obama and his “overt racial appeals” at a Maryland event where he spoke for Anthony Brown and attendees began to leave during his speech.

With the midterm elections just two weeks away, it was seen as an attempt to turn out the black vote.

Advertisement-content continues below

According to Riley, it was a slap in the face.

“What has [Obama and his party] done for blacks?”
“Why should blacks be enthusiastic about getting out to the polls to keep the president’s party in power?”

Riley expanded on that idea by noting the conditions blacks have seen since Obama took office.

“On another level, why should blacks be eager to run to the polls to support the Senate Democrats and Harry Reid? What have they done for blacks?
“Black unemployment is higher. Black labor participation rates are the lowest they’ve been in 30 years. Black poverty is going up. Why should blacks be enthusiastic about getting out to the polls to keep the president’s party in power? But to have a president out there pushing this racial angle–we’ve had stories in both the New York Times and the Wall Street Journal to this effect–I think is very troubling.”

Riley also pointed out,

“It’s not just a red state, Democrat problem–that’s what is so remarkable about the Maryland footage. That’s a deep blue state that Obama won by 26 points in 2012. It’s quite remarkable. But what’s also remarkable to me is the reaction to this by the White House, which is to make overt racial appeals to get out the base. We have a president of the United States and an attorney general making overt racial appeals to voters. I find that very disturbing.”
“The voter ID stuff that they’ve been talking about constantly as if there’s some sort of Republican conspiracy out there to deny blacks the franchise. It’s just not true. Black voter turnout in 2012 was higher than white voter turnout in 2012,” Riley explained.

H/T Daily Caller

Read more at http://www.westernjournalism.com/wall-street-journal-columnist-why-should-blacks-be-eager-to-keep-the-presidents-party-in-power/#72YrmA0xHg4ZPjLb.99

Exclusive: Top Lawyer At ICE Resigns

The top lawyer at U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) has resigned weeks before President Obama is expected to issue a major executive amnesty.

Peter S. Vincent, ICE's principal legal advisor, resigned, telling colleagues in an email Tuesday afternoon “I have decided that the time is right for me to make a change and to move on to other opportunities and challenges.”

There is no evidence Vincent's departure is related to potential executive actions by the president, although the timing is conspicuous.

Gillian Christensen, a spokeswoman for ICE, said “Any insinuation that his departure is a reflection on ICE efforts to focus resources through prosecutorial discretion, or any possible administrative action related to immigration reform is inaccurate and a discredit to the tireless work he has performed for the agency over the past six years.”

In his farewell email to colleagues, Vincent did not provide any specific reason for his departure, nor any information about his plans after leaving the agency.

Christensen said Vincent's “true passion lies in legal and international affairs and that is what he is planning to pursue in the next phase of his career.”

In addition to his title as “principal legal advisor,” Vincent also carried the title “senior counselor for international policy.”

Vincent was a key player in the implementation of President Obama's “Deferred Action for Childhood Arrival” program issued in 2012, for instance issuing 2011 guidance to ICE lawyers about the program.

In the email, Vincent recounted how ICE's work is often controversial.

“As I have often said, much of what we do at ICE to protect the homeland is, for better or worse, guaranteed to upset exactly 50 percent of the public, 100 percent of the time. You, more than any other group of dedicated professionals and committed public servants, are best suited and ideally situated to handle the incredibly delicate balance of protecting the homeland while, at the same time, remaining sensitive to compelling humanitarian concerns,” he said.

“Mr. Vincent has been a proud and valued member of ICE’s leadership team and his contributions will be greatly missed by the agency,” Christensen said.

The Lost Virtue of Modesty | Association of Biblical Counselors

The Lost Virtue of Modesty

Posted on 9/30/2014 by Kevin DeYoung

I don’t know if modest is hottest, but I do know that modesty is biblical.

It is one of the marks of the confusion of our age that so many teenagers and young adults are more ashamed to dress with modest reserve than to very nearly undress entirely. Even after we give full throat to the necessary caveats–being pretty (or handsome) is not a sin, working to improve your appearance does not have to be vanity, the line between modest and immodest is not always black and white–we are still left with the undeniable biblical fact that God considers modesty a virtue and its opposite a vice.

Here are five biblical reasons Christians should embrace modesty as a God-designed, God-desired good thing.

1. Modesty protects what is intimate. There is a certain strand of feminism which says women should be proud of their sexual prowess and that any insistence they cover up what they don’t feel like covering up only serves to reinforce patriarchal notions that men have the right to determine what women do with their bodies. But the Bible’s call to modesty is not based on the supposed naughtiness of the female form. God’s good command to cover up is not meant to punish, but to protect. As Wendy Shalit writes, “The pressure on girls today to take sexy selfies comes out of a culture that routinely equates modesty with shame, instead of recognizing it for what it really is: an impulse that protects what is precious and intimate.” The common refrain of the bride–“do not stir up or awaken love until it pleases” (Song of Solomon 2:7)–is a call from one woman to a group of single women to save sexual arousal and sexual activity for its proper time, with the proper person, in the proper place.

2. Modesty accepts that our bodies also live in community. What does that mean? It means that while it sounds nice to say, “It’s my body. If I want to let it all hang out, that’s my business.” This is to forget that our bodies exists in a wider network of relationships, just like our speech does, and our actions, our will, and our desires. How we dress is not determined by how others wished we would dress. And yet, it would be sub-Christian to act as if the spiritual state of those around us was inconsequential.

Before going any further, let me state this as clearly as possible: men are responsible for their adultery, for their fornication, for their pornographic viewing, for their lust, and for their (heaven forbid) sexual assault, regardless of how a woman dresses. The Bible does not enjoin modesty on either sex because the opposite sex is simply incapable of keeping its pants on and its thoughts in check. Listen men: if Potiphar’s wife were to barge in and dance a bare-bellied jig on your kitchen table and strip you down to your birthday suit, you would still not be excused in committing adultery with her. The absence of modesty in one party does not justify the absence of restraint in another.

Having said all that, does not the law of love suggest that we should want to avoid enticing others into sin? The phrase “with lustful intent” in Matthew 5:28 is translated by some scholars (D.A. Carson among them): “so as to get her lust.” The meaning, then, instead of being about lust in the man’s heart, would be about the man wanting to get a woman to lust after him. Whether one accepts this minority position or not, it’s still a fair application to think that Jesus’ statement forbids us from having a heart attitude that lusts and a heart attitude that wants to be lusted after. Some people want to see pornography and others want to be pornography. Maybe not in a literal sense, but there are men and women who crave the power, the attention, and the status that comes from being noticed and sought after. This entices others to sin and is in itself sinful.

3. Modesty operates with the Bible’s negative assessment of public nudity post-Fall. From Adam and Eve scrambling for fig leaves (Gen. 3:10), to the dishonorable nakedness of Noah (Gen. 9:21), to the embarrassingly exposed buttocks of David’s men (2 Sam. 10:4), the Bible knows we inhabit a fallen world in which certain aspects of our bodily selves are meant to be hidden. Indeed, this is precisely what Paul presumes when he speaks of “our unpresentable parts” which must be “treated with greater modesty” (1 Cor. 12:23). There’s a reason momma called them private parts.

4. Modesty embraces the strong biblical admonition to refrain from sensuality. Sensuality (Gk: aselgeia) is a distinguishing characteristic of the flesh and one of the marks of the pagan world (Gal. 5:19; Rom. 13:13; 2 Cor. 12:21; 2 Pet. 2:2, 18). Does the word give us exact instructions on where good taste trips over into sensuality–how long skirts can be, what sort of bathing suit to wear, or whether beefy men need to run around shirtless when its 60 degrees in Michigan? No. But surely we can agree that it is not uncommon for men and women to dress in ways which only add to the look and feel of our culture’s ubiquitous sensuality. If the word aselgeia suggests sexual excess (TDNT), we would do well to consider whether the desire behind our deportment is to starve this sensual beast or to sate it.

5. Modesty demonstrates to others that we have more important things to offer than good looks and sex appeal. The point of 1 Timothy 2:9 and 1 Peter 3:3-4 is not an absolute prohibition against trying to look nice. The prohibition is against trying so very hard to look good in all the ways that are so relatively unimportant. The question asked of women in these verses–and it certainly applies to men as well–is this: will you grab people’s attention with hair and jewelry and sexy clothes or will your presence in the room be unmistakable because of your Christlike character? Immodest dress tells the world, “I’m not sure I have anything more to offer than this. What you see is really all you get.”

Let me state the obvious: the Bible has no pictures. There is no inspired how-to manual for getting dressed in the morning. There are matters of culture, conscience, and context which surely come into place. I have no checklist to check off before you head out the door.

But if the Bible is to be believed, this whole business of modesty is not irrelevant to Christian discipleship. Our bodies have been bought with a price. Therefore glorify God with your body (1 Cor. 6:20). Which means we don’t show everyone everything we might think is worth seeing. And it means we won’t be embarrassed to keep most private those things that are most precious. Shame is a powerful category, in the Bible and in our own day. The key is knowing what things we should actually be ashamed of.

Kevin blogs at the Gospel Coalition; this article is reprinted with his permission.

Monday, October 20, 2014

AFA - Pastor Threatened With Jail

AFA - Pastor Threatened With `

Pastor Threatened With Jail

By: Bryan Fischer

Posted: Monday, October 20, 2014 10:35 AM

Bryan FischerDirector of Issue Analysis and Host of "Focal Point"More Articles

This is proof that the Gay Gestapo is not about tolerance and live-and-let-live at all. They are the biggest bullies and bigots on the block.

Pastor will not take mark of the beast, will go to jail

MARRIAGE. A marriage between a man and a woman is the only domestic legal union that shall be valid or recognized in this state. - Idaho Constitution, Article III, Section 28

GUARANTY OF RELIGIOUS LIBERTY. The exercise and enjoyment of religious faith and worship shall forever be guaranteed; and no person shall be denied any civil or political right, privilege, or capacity on account of his religious opinions. ~ Idaho Constitution, Article I, Section 4

Last week, I wrote that today’s “mark of the beast” is the gay rainbow. If you don’t have the gay rainbow sticker plastered all over your forehead and forearm and the windows of your business, you will not be allowed to buy or sell. Bakers, florists, photographers, bed and breakfast owners, counselors and broadcasters have discovered this the hard way.

Now pastors are being required to take the mark or be sent to jail.

As impossible as this should be in America, the land of the free and the home of religious liberty, it is happening as we speak in Idaho, one of the most conservative states in the union.

There, in Coeur D’Alene, ordained ministers Donald Knapp and his wife Evelyn are going to spend 180 days in jail and be fined $1000 a day for politely declining to perform a sodomy-based marriage ceremony.

Yes, you read that right. Declining to perform a homosexual wedding is now a crime in America.

If you ever doubted that the homosexual agenda is the greatest threat to religious liberty we have ever faced in American history, doubt no longer.

The Knapps run the Hitching Post Wedding Chapel. Last Friday, a practitioner of the infamous crime against nature called them to ask the Knapps to perform a wedding for him and his partner.

All this since John Roberts and Supreme Court used their gavels like sledgehammers to shatter Idaho’s constitution and its protection for natural marriage into little tiny shards.

Homosexuals have been dancing in the streets in Idaho since same-sex nuptials began last week. Now they intend to dance on the the grave of the Knapps’ wedding business.

After the Knapps declined, the Gruppenfuhrers who run the city are now intent on putting the Knapps behind bars for six months and fining them $180,000 unless they surrender every principle of conscience they hold dear and start performing ceremonies which God has clearly condemned.

And it’s not as if homosexuals have no other options. They literally can go right across the street and get married in the Kootenai County courthouse any time they please. This is proof that the Gay Gestapo is not about tolerance and live-and-let-live at all. They are the biggest bullies and bigots on the block.

If this sounds like secular Sharia to you, there is nothing wrong with your hearing. Secular fundamentalists in America are as much of a threat to liberty as the mullahs in Iran.

You will hear a bunch of legalistic argle-bargle about public accommodations and such. Don’t be deceived. All that is just thinly-veiled cover for anti-Christian bigotry and heterophobia.

The city is basing its Nazi-esque brutality on its “non-discrimination” ordinance. This is laughable on its face. This ordinance is in fact a “pro-discrimination” ordinance since it enshrines, celebrates and honors blatant and egregious discrimination of the worst kind against people of faith.

Pastors are persons, and the Idaho state constitution explicitly declares that “no person shall be denied any civil or political right, privilege, or capacity on account of his religious opinions.” Unless, of course, the gay mafia is after you. In that case, Christians have no rights which secularists are bound to respect.

All this grieves the heart of God, but delights the heart of the Prince of Darkness. To paraphrase Don McLean: as the flames climbed high into the night to light the abominable rite, I saw Satan laughing with delight, the day that marriage died.

(Unless otherwise noted, the opinions expressed are the author’s and do not necessarily reflect the views of the American Family Association or American Family Radio.)

Recommended Resources

Parents and Friends of Ex-Gays and Gays

Christian Counseling & Educational Foundation

Genesis Counseling

New Hope Ministries

Restored Hope Network

Desert Stream Ministries

Sunday, October 19, 2014

Obama's new Ebola Magnet: Fast Tracking West African Citizens!

Saturday, October 18, 2014

Obama Carrying Out Muslim Agenda Destroy America!

Watch: Finding Out Who Is Profiting From The Ebola Outbreak Will Make You Sick | RedFlagNews.com

Watch: Finding Out Who Is Profiting From The Ebola Outbreak Will Make You Sick

(Western Journalism) -- Ever wonder why the rate of Ebola infection increased a staggering 1000% in a matter of weeks?

Or why mega-banks bought hundreds of thousands of shares in a little-known pharmaceutical company—Tekmira—developing an Ebola vaccine—all on the same day, June 30, 2014?

Advertisement-content continues below

Or why this year’s shadowy Bilderberg group meeting contained a staggering amount of pharmaceutical heads, health ministers, and doctors?

22 Likes

The Most Dangerous Woman In America... | RedFlagNews.com

The Most Dangerous Woman In America...

(by Dave Hodges)

Most of you know the look you get when you honestly try and convince a member of the “Sheeple Nation” that America is on life support and that tens of millions are in grave danger. Along these lines, I was recently speaking with a friend of mine from Tennessee and began to point out how bad things in this country have become. Inevitably, the discussion began to center around the subject of unwarranted detention centers, such as the ones I have identified on this site, including NFL stadiums, NBA and NHL arenas and shopping malls. And I added that this is on top of the fact that the US already houses two million inmate, mostly for private profit through the CCA. I told him that DHS had signed agreements with all of these entities so that Americans could be detained without due process.

My friend rolled his eyes and repeated the national anthem of all sheep, “I didn’t know you were one of them conspiracy theorists.” He couldn’t hold back the laughter. Subsequently, I spent 30 minutes showing him the following evidence, in its raw form, and he was visibly shaken.

Americans do not live in an emerging police state; all Americans now live in a fully developed police state. From a false flag event, 9/11, to the development of the most complete police state apparatus the world has ever seen, one has to wonder what’s the “endgame”?

In a recent article, I investigated the question as to whether had the personality traits necessary to carry out heinous acts against the American people. Given the fact that the President could quite easily be judged to have Antisocial Personality Disorder (e.g. formerly psychopath and sociopath), Narcissistic Personality Disorder and Paranoid Personality Disorder, the answer is, yes. Obama could be counted to carry out such orders. Who is the likely conduit between Obama and the real source of power in this country? Obama has had so much movement in his cabinet, the only person who could be considered to be Obama’s handler would be Valerie Jarrett. And when one takes a look at Jarrett, she sends chills down my back.

Valerie Jarrett Reveals An End Game Agenda

It was shocking when President George W. Bush stated “you are either with us, or you are with the terrorists.” Senior White House Advisor, Valerie Jarrett, has taken these words to a significantly more dramatic level when she stated that “there will be hell to pay” for Obama’s critics in the second term”.

To be more specific, Jarrett said, “After we win this election, it is payback time. For those who supported us, there will be rewards, for the ones who opposed us, they will get what they deserve. There will be hell to pay. Congress won’t be a problem for us this time. With no election to worry about, we have two judges ready to go.”

These are prophetic words and they constitute a threat to any American who does not support the banksters takeover of the country.

Valerie Jarrett Is a Stalinist

Jarrett’s family comes from communist leanings. Here family intermarried with the Bill Ayers family. Yes, that would be the Weathermen Underground terrorist leader, Bill Ayers. That would be the same Bill Ayers who told FBI informant, the late Larry Grathwohl, “that when we take over the United States, we will forcibly detain 50 million Americans in re-education camps in which they will probably have to murder 25 million American citizens who cannot be re-educated.” Grathwohl repeated the Ayers statement on the August 18, 2012 edition of The Common Sense Show.

This is the same Valerie Jarrett family which was also involved with Frank Davis the former head of the Communist Party in the United States. This is the same Frank Davis who Joel Gilbert exposed as Obama’s real father. Additionally, the Jarrett family is also affiliated with other so-called “Red Diaper Babies” in which this young group of intellectual elites called for a communist takeover of the United States in the late 1960′s and early 1970′s. For those that know their history, you will remember that the same people engage in terrorist acts involving the detonation of explosive devices in which people died, including a San Francisco police officer. Bill Ayers wife, Bernardine Dorne served a prison term for her participation with this group. And we also know, that Bill Ayers and Bernadine Dorne, close friends of Jarrett to this day, funded President Obama’s Harvard education funded . These facts are representative of the reasons related to why many believe that Valerie Jarrett is making the major decisions in the White House. Therefore, it we be prudent to take a look at Jarrett, herself, to determine the direction of the country and the fate of the people in this country.

Jarrett Is Highly Paranoid

Jarrett would have no trouble viewing the bulk of the American people as an enemy which must be dealt with because she is so highly paranoid.

Jarrett’s extreme paranoid ideation, she sees perceived racism in the wallpaper of a room. While serving as the Department of Planning and Development Commissioner for the City of Chicago, Jarrett once harassed a white business owner for not paying sufficient deference, in print, to the memory of the city’s first black mayor in the mid-1990′s. As Ellie Monty was actually one of the two white owners of the small firm targeted by Jarrett on this issue. Monty described the event as a contrived racial incident in which Jarrett was using fake racial issues to make a name for herself as a reformer in the same exact fashion as did Obama when he was a community activist. I believe in modern day parlance, this attack on Monty would be referred to as a false flag event and we know that the Obama Administration is no stranger to the topic of false flag attacks. And speaking of wallpaper, there is absolute proof that Jarrett was a vicious slum lord and took advantage of the poverty-stricken black people that she seemingly worked so hard to defend as a reformer.

Jarrett Is An Extreme Narcissist

Jarrett has consistently acted with a stunning amount of depraved indifference toward her fellow human beings.

Valerie Jarrett is indeed both a criminal and a human rights violator. She has participated in abusing large numbers of impoverished black citizens and her actions have contributed to these poor souls living in a squalor befitting the worst of a third world country as she became one of America’s most notorious slum lords.

Unfortunately, Jarrett’s slum lord actions took place in Chicago, not in a third world country. Jarrett performed her misdeeds in former State Senator Obama’s Senatorial district in which the future president secured federal funding for Jarrett’s slum housing project.

Jarrett’s political record in Chicago was nothing to be proud about. Jarrett, already was known for her corruption and incompetence, when she was eventually fired by Mayor Daley after a scandal erupted over her role in misuse of public funds in the city’s substandard public housing. In other words, a known political criminal found it necessary to fire a criminal because Jarrett was too extreme, even for Mayor Daley.

Jarrett was the former CEO of Habitat Co., which managed Grove Parc Plaza beginning in 2001 and continued through the time that she served as a member of Obama’s presidential campaign finance committee, until the federally subsidized Chicago complex was seized by the federal government after inspectors found the conditions to unlivable.

Please allow me to pause and ask a question. How does a woman, fired by a corrupt mayor for corruption and busted by the federal government for absconding with federal housing funds while maintaining an apartment complex under the most horrific of conditions, get to be the President’s most trusted adviser?

Jarrett’s past actions are indicative of an individual who would not hesitate to act with extreme malice toward a country who is beginning to believe that this administration is the most dangerous administration American people. Does my mental health expertise allow me to make the professional judgment that both Jarrett and Obama would ever make the call to carry out the creator of both of their political careers, Bill Ayers? Without question, this is the case. Ask yourself this question, how hard is to go from this… Continue reading via Before It's News...

BILL'S TWITTER PAGE