Obama and advancing Marx's agenda, "Forward"

Obama and advancing Marx's agenda, "Forward"

ijreview.com

June 5, 2012 3:33 pm

When someone says that Barack Obama is a ‘socialist’, the mobs begin to encircle.  The media starts to throw sticks and stones, saying that the accuser is a ‘racist’ or a ‘conspiracy theorist’.  According to Nancy Pelosi, the individual is immediately branded as a swastika carrying member of the rabid Tea Party, one of those evil people that gave them grief at those infamous townhall meetings just after the passage of Obamacare.
If you call Obama a ‘socialist’, then you must be crazy, or just downright close-minded to the wonderful things he’s doing to this country.  While he may be taking us one step back, he will soon advance us two steps “Forward” …just the way Karl Marx would do it.
In a recent article from CNBC.com, conservative thinkers see red in the water.
The Obama campaign’s new slogan is only one word: “Forward”.  While it may just be one word, those who have studied the belief system of socialist and communist philosophers understand that there is more to this word than meets the eye.  While this may be an adorable slogan inspiring hope and change, it carries dangerous implications.  The report states,

“Forward,” they asserted, is a word long associated with Europe’s radical left. Its choice reaffirmed their contention that Obama is, to some degree or other, a socialist — a claim that surfaced early in the 2008 campaign and has persisted ever since, fueling a lively industry of bumper stickers and books.”

The report goes on to say,

“New Obama slogan has long ties to Marxism, socialism,” read a headline in The Washington Times. A column by Russian immigrant Svetlana Kunin, for Investor’s Business Daily, said Obama seeks to move America forward to “total government involvement in people’s lives.”

These ‘long ties to Marxism, socialism’ to which the Washington Times article was referring has to do with the Hegelian Dialectic.  TheFreeDictionary.com gives the definition of the Hegelian Dialectic:

n. (Philosophy) Philosophy an interpretive method in which the contradiction between a proposition (thesis) and its antithesis is resolved at a higher level of truth (synthesis)”

Essentially, Marx and Hegel supposed that every time there is a major ‘change’, whether good or bad, it marches society ‘forward’ to a greater state, a state where there is “total government involvement in people’s lives.”  Essentially, they look ‘forward’ to a time where the world is ruled by a full-fledged ‘dictatorship of the proletariat’.
The Chinese make the Hegelian Dialectic simple to understand for the children in their educational programs, as the teacher dances two steps ‘forward’, and one step back.  Marx, Lenin, and Hegel all knew that a crisis is the best way to move ‘forward’ (problem-reaction-solution), and as Rahm Emanuel said, “Never let a serious crisis go to waste.”
But, could this just be a coincidence?  Can one word truly indicate the entire social philosophy of the incumbent President?  No.  However, his actions have given us more than enough to go on.
Not only have his efforts obviously done enough to fatally wound the US economy, but government spending on public welfare has increased exponentially in the past 4 years, while unemployment has sat above 8% for the longest time since before most of us were alive.  As Vladimir Lenin said, “The capitalists will sell us the rope with which we will hang them.”  We may have just sold Barack Hussein Obama a rope, dear patriots.
Of course, it really is no surprise that CNBC would be defending our rope purchaser-in-chief, saying that those who suspect the President of pushing ‘forward’ a socialist agenda must all be racist:

This is far from a new phenomenon — the use of “socialist” as a political epithet in the U.S. dates to pre-Civil War days when abolitionist newspaper editor Horace Greeley was branded a socialist by some pro-slavery adversaries. In the 20th century, many elements of Franklin Roosevelt’s New Deal — including Social Security — were denounced as socialist. So was Medicare when it was created in the 1960s.”

But, then again, that’s just CNBC for you.  Are you surprised?